Hard Gel

open beauty facts178mlGTIN 0625336616437

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.

6Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent

88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

82 pts apart

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmental1.0×

Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packaging1.0×

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good23 of 32 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 23 of 32 listed ingredients; 9 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (7)

sodium hydroxymethylglycinatepreservative · hair conditioningraters disagree
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
triethanolaminefragrance · buffering · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamateuv filter · uv absorber · light stabilizerraters disagree
Endocrine-activeflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
parfumundeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
fragranceundeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
carbomeremulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
blue 1cosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

No flags in our sources (16)

No data in our sources (9)

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

undeclared fragrance blendparfum
- parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
humectantglycerin
- glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

Chatters

Hard Gel

open beauty facts178mlGTIN 0625336616437

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.

6Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent

88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

82 pts apart

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmental1.0×

Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packaging1.0×

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good23 of 32 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 23 of 32 listed ingredients; 9 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (7)

sodium hydroxymethylglycinatepreservative · hair conditioningraters disagree
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
triethanolaminefragrance · buffering · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamateuv filter · uv absorber · light stabilizerraters disagree
Endocrine-activeflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
parfumundeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
fragranceundeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
carbomeremulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
blue 1cosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

No flags in our sources (16)

No data in our sources (9)

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

undeclared fragrance blendparfum
- parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
humectantglycerin
- glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".