Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/John Frieda/Frizz Ease Leave-In Conditioner
Frizz Ease Leave-In Conditioner
John Frieda

Frizz Ease Leave-In Conditioner

Conditioner200mlGTIN 0717226302497
Bio Therapy Conditioner

Cleaner pick · Safest cleansing we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Conditioner

+47 on ingredient safety

250ml · 47.50 ZAR · 19 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 6967 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

64OUT OF 100Fair

range 58–81

53▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
74
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

46-point split

47

Scan

42

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

6967 found

See better →

Flagged

9 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 46-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 6967 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

46 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·30 of 37 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 30 of 37 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (9)

    • FRAGRANCE6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • PARFUM6/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CITRONELLOL6/10perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • HEXYL CINNAMAL6/10perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • CETRIMONIUM CHLORIDE4/10preservative · antimicrobial · antistaticraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • SODIUM HYDROXIDE4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • TETRAMETHYL ACETYLOCTAHYDRONAPHTHALENES4/10perfuming · fragrance · skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (21)

    • WATER
    • AQUA
    • GLYCERIN
    • AMODIMETHICONE
    • DIPROPYLENE GLYCOL
    • OLIVE OIL PEG-7 ESTERS
    • PANTHENOL
    • TRIDECETH-12
    • COCOS NUCIFERA OIL
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • SODIUM LAUROYL LACTYLATE
    • SODIUM BICARBONATE
    • CERAMIDE NP
    • CERAMIDE AP
    • PHYTOSPHINGOSINE
    • CHOLESTEROL
    • XANTHAN GUM
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
    • POLYACRYLIC ACID
    • CERAMIDE EOP
    • SODIUM BENZOATE

    No data in our sources (7)

    • VP
    • DIMETHYLAMINOETHYLMETHACRYLATE COPOLYMER
    • BISAMINO PEG
    • PPG-41
    • 3 AMINOETHYL PG-PROPYL DIMETHICONE
    • DIMETHILE PEG-8 MEADOWFOAMATE
    • TETRASODIUM GLUTAMATE DIACETHE

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.