Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/hello/Peace out, plaque Antigingivitis/antiplaque mouthwash
H
hello

Peace out, plaque Antigingivitis/antiplaque mouthwash

Open Beauty FactsGTIN 0819156023432

Your composite

74OUT OF 100Good

range 69–80

84
Safety
—
Eco
65
Labor
—
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Raters agree
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    85
  • IARC MonographsGovernmentunverified match
    82

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
  • California Proposition 65

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    Raters agree
    • Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofitunverified match
      74
    • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
      55

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–100→85
    • IARC Monographs82 on 0–100→82
    Average of 85 · 82pillar84

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Flagged ingredients

    • aloe vera4 positions →
    • citric acid4 positions →

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Fair·6 of 14 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 6 of 14 listed ingredients; 8 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    water→antiplaqueskin conditioningsolventantiplaqueskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    aloe vera→—4/10IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    xylitol→humectantskin conditioninghumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    natural essential oil flavor blend→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    caprylic→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    capric glycerides→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    ethyl lauroyl arginate hci→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    citric acid→fragrancechelatingbufferingfragrancechelatingbuffering4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    vegan→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    xylitol is harmful to pets→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    o nowfoods→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    com→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    petsafety for details→—Not in our sourcesNo data

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from prnewswire.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.