Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 24-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Cleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Lowest 76 · highest 100 · gap 24
Also screened — no listing found
Coverage & match quality
5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
no black box
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
Raters split here, so this 83 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
Flagged 3 of 22 ingredients: 2 of concern.
Starts at 100; 20 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 24 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Good17 of 22 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 17 of 22 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| propanediolsolventviscosity controlling | solventviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| waterantiplaqueskin conditioningsolvent | antiplaqueskin conditioningsolvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Aquasolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| sodium stearatecleansingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | cleansingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| polyglyceryl 10 caprylatesurfactant - emulsifying | surfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| caprate | Not in our sources | No data | |
| caprylyl glycolemollientdeodoranthair conditioning | emollientdeodoranthair conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| fragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced | |
| parfumperfumingfragrance | perfumingfragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| sodium chloridefragranceoral carebulking | fragranceoral carebulking | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| cetyl alcoholfragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | fragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| aloe barbadensis leaf extracthumectantemollientoral care | humectantemollientoral care | IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| hamamelis virginiana | Not in our sources | No data | |
| leaf extracts | Not in our sources | No data | |
| gossypium herbaceum seed extractskin conditioning | skin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| calendula officinalis flower extractperfumingfragranceskin conditioning | perfumingfragranceskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| commiphora myrrha resin extractnail conditioningskin conditioning | nail conditioningskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| usnea barbata extractdeodorant | deodorant | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| citrus grandis seed extractperfumingastringenttonic | perfumingastringenttonic | Examined, no flag | CosIng-catalogued |
| chamomilla recutita | Not in our sources | No data | |
| flower extracts | Not in our sources | No data | |
| fusanus spicatus wood oilfragrance | fragrance | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.