Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Love Beauty and Planet/Coconut Water & Mimosa Flower Shampoo
LB
Love Beauty and Planet

Coconut Water & Mimosa Flower Shampoo

shampoosGTIN 0886467033025

Your composite

66OUT OF 100Fair

range 63–74

70▲▼ split
Safety
70
Eco
80
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

34-point split

78

Scan

60

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flagged

4 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 34-point gap between the two loudest voices.

60Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 34 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    78
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    85
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    60
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    94

Lowest 60 · highest 94 · gap 34

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
  • California Proposition 65

Recognized on a safer-ingredients list

  • US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) — 57% of ingredients recognized

Environmental

  • Open Beauty Facts Organic & NaturalNonprofitunverified match
    70

Also screened — no listing found

  • EU Microplastics Restriction

Labor

Raters agree
  • Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofitunverified match
    74
  • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
    85

Packaging

  • Greenlens Packaging ScanIndependentunverified match
    46

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 4 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan78 on 0–100→78
  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–100→85
  • Greenlens Precautionary Screen60 on 0–100→60
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen94 on 0–100→94
Average of 78 · 85 · 60 · 94pillar70

Raters split here, so this 70 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

78/100

Flagged 2 of 23 ingredients: 1 restricted, 1 of concern.

  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
  • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10

Starts at 100; 19 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 34 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Flagged ingredients

  • Cocamidopropyl Betaine3 positions →
  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)3 positions →
  • CITRIC ACID4 positions →
  • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDE3 positions →

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good·17 of 21 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 17 of 21 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
WATER→antiplaqueskin conditioningsolventantiplaqueskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE→cleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingcleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
cocamidopropyl BETAINE→antistaticcleansinghair conditioningantistaticcleansinghair conditioning6/10Strong contact sensitizer· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
SODIUM CHLORIDE→fragranceoral carebulkingfragranceoral carebulkingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
FRAGRANCE→—4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
SODIUM BENZoATE→preservativefragranceanticorrosivepreservativefragranceanticorrosiveNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
CITRIC ACID→fragrancechelatingbufferingfragrancechelatingbuffering4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
PPG-9→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
DISODIUM EDTA→chelatingviscosity controllingchelatingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
POLYQUATERNIUM-10→film formingantistaticfilm formingantistaticNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
COCUS NUCIFERA→—Not in our sourcesNo data
OIL→—Not in our sourcesNo data
GLYCERIN→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
COCOS NUCIFERA→—Not in our sourcesNo data
ACACIA DECURRENS FLOWER EXTRACT→perfumingfragranceperfumingfragranceNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL→perfumingantifoamingsolventperfumingantifoamingsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
SODIUM ACETATE→fragrancebufferingfragrancebufferingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
SODIUM HYDROXIDE→bufferingdenaturantbufferingdenaturant4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
POTASSIUM SORBATE→preservativefragrancepreservativefragranceNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
TAPI0CA STARCH→—Not in our sourcesNo data
COCONUT→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.