Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Bourjois/Precision Eyebrow Pencil Chestnut 03
B
Bourjois

Precision Eyebrow Pencil Chestnut 03

eye pencils13gGTIN 3052503810393
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+48 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 11105 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

43OUT OF 100Poor

range 35–55

52▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

80

Scan

90

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

11105 found

See better →

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 60-point gap between the two loudest voices.

30ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 11105 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

60 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Bourjois as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·22 of 22 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 22 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (3)

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • PROPYL GALLATE6/10fragrance materialperfuming · antioxidantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (19)

    • CERA MICROCRISTALLINA
    • HYDROGENATED PALM KERNEL GLYCERIDES
    • COPERNICIA CERIFERA WAX
    • HYDROGENATED PALM GLYCERIDES
    • MYRISTYL MYRISTATEcomedogenic in testing
    • HYDROGENATED COCO-GLYCERIDES
    • HYDROGENATED CASTOR OIL
    • RHUS SUCCEDANEA FRUIT CERA
    • SORBITAN PALMITATE
    • STEARALKONIUM HECTORITE
    • PROPYLENE CARBONATE
    • MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX
    • CARNAUBA
    • RHUS SUCCEDANEA FRUIT WAX
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77499
    • MICA
    • CI 77491
    • IRON OXIDES
    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • comedogenic in testingMYRISTYL MYRISTATE

      • MYRISTYL MYRISTATE: A waxy emollient named among the pore-clogging materials in the rabbit-ear assay. Fulton JE Jr, Pay SR, Fulton JE 3rd, "Comedogenicity of current therapeutic products, cosmetics, and ingredients in the rabbit ear", J Am Acad Dermatol 1984;10(1):96-105, PMID 6229554. The openly readable abstract names this ingredient among its "ingredient offenders", in prose and without a numeric rating: "Ingredient offenders include isopropyl myristate and its analogs, such as isopropyl palmitate, isopropyl isostearate, butyl stearate, isostearyl neopentanoate, myristyl myristate..." The rabbit-ear assay rates raw ingredients and does not predict how a finished formula behaves on human skin.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfreekitty.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.