Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Casino/2in1 Toothpaste Fresh Action
2in1 Toothpaste Fresh Action
Casino

2in1 Toothpaste Fresh Action

Toothpaste75mlGTIN 3222472861188
5in1 Tooth Cream

Cleaner pick · Safest multi-function toothpaste we have rated

alverde

5in1 Tooth Cream

+11 on ingredient safety

75ml

Ingredient safetySplit · 45→95
Find on Amazon ↗See all 5 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

49OUT OF 100Poor

range 44–61

51▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

34-point split

48

Scan

42

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

5 found

See better →

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 34-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
76Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 5 cleaner options, safest first → Never ordered by affiliate payout.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

34 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · IARC Monographs

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·11 of 15 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 11 of 15 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (5)

    • flavouring6/10raters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE4/10antiplaque · oral careraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • sodium fluoride4/10antiplaque · oral careraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • CI 741604/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (6)

    • water
    • SORBITOL
    • HYDRATED SILICA
    • XANTHAN GUM
    • SODIUM SACCHARIN
    • SODIUM METHYLPARABEN

    No data in our sources (4)

    • SOVEM LAURYL SULFATE
    • CETYPYRIDINIUM CHLORIDE
    • MICA 0 77891
    • du monofluorophosphate de sodium

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.