Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Auchan/Bain de bouche soin complet
A
Auchan

Bain de bouche soin complet

mouthwashGTIN 3245678674901

Your composite

54OUT OF 100Poor

range 36–100

54▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

64-point split

36

Scan

100

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flagged

11 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 64-point gap between the two loudest voices.

36Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 64 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    36
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    85
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    60
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    80
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    76

Lowest 36 · highest 100 · gap 64

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • California Proposition 65

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan36 on 0–100→36
    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–100→85
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen100 on 0–100→100
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors60 on 0–100→60
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)80 on 0–100→80
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen76 on 0–100→76
    Average of 36 · 85 · 100 · 60 · 80 · 76pillar54

    Raters split here, so this 54 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    36/100

    Flagged 11 of 21 ingredients: 4 restricted, 1 of concern, 6 regulated allergens.

    • N,N-BIS(2-HYDROXYETHYL)- P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE SULFATEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • Sodium fluorideEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • MentholEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • CarvoneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • AnetholeEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • Mentha Viridis Leaf OilEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • LimoneneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−0
    • PineneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−0
    • CURRY REDEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • ACID BLUE 9EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10

    Starts at 100; 10 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 64 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Flagged ingredients

    • N,N-BIS(2-HYDROXYETHYL)- P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE SULFATE4 positions →
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)3 positions →
    • Sodium fluoride4 positions →
    • Menthol3 positions →
    • Carvone4 positions →
    • Anethole3 positions →
    • Mentha Viridis Leaf Oil3 positions →
    • Limonene5 positions →
    • Pinene3 positions →
    • CURRY RED3 positions →
    • ACID BLUE 93 positions →

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·20 of 21 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 20 of 21 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Aqua→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    alcohol denat→fragranceantimicrobialantifoamingfragranceantimicrobialantifoaming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    sorbitol→perfumingfragrancehumectantperfumingfragrancehumectantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    peg-40 hydrogenated castor oil→surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    aroma→flavouringflavouring4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    sodium benzoate→preservativefragranceanticorrosivepreservativefragranceanticorrosiveNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    allantoin→soothingskin conditioningskin protectingsoothingskin conditioningskin protectingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    potassium acesulfame→fragrancefragranceNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    sodium saccharin→fragranceflavouringoral carefragranceflavouringoral careNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    cetylpyridinium chloride→antimicrobialantistaticdeodorantantimicrobialantistaticdeodorantNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    sodium fluoride→antiplaqueoral careantiplaqueoral care4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    benzoic acid→preservativefragranceph adjusterspreservativefragranceph adjustersNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    menthol→fragrancedenaturantrefreshingfragrancedenaturantrefreshing4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    eucalyptus globulus oil→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    carvone→perfumingfragranceflavouringperfumingfragranceflavouring6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    anethole→fragrancedenaturantfragrancedenaturant4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    mentha viridis leaf oil→fragranceastringentskin conditioningfragranceastringentskin conditioning4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    limonene→perfumingdeodorantsolventperfumingdeodorantsolvent7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    pinene→fragranceantifoamingfragranceantifoaming4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    ci 16035→coloranthair dyeingcoloranthair dyeing4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    ci 42090→coloranthair dyeingcoloranthair dyeing4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced