Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Franprix/Hydrating Cream
Hydrating Cream
Franprix

Hydrating Cream

produit de beaute75mlGTIN 3263854395013
conditionner hydro intensive color care

Cleaner pick · Safest produit de beaute we have rated

hair borist

conditionner hydro intensive color care

+18 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetySplit · 68→100
Find on Amazon ↗See the one cleaner option →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

58OUT OF 100Fair

range 53–70

58▲▼ split
Safety
70
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1 found

See better →

Flagged

4 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1 cleaner option, safest first → Never ordered by affiliate payout.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

52 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65

Environmental

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good·18 of 27 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 18 of 27 listed ingredients; 9 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (4)

  • PARFUM6/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • ALOE BARBADENSIS LEAF EXTRACT4/10humectant · emollient · oral careraters disagree

    IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • SODIUM HYDROXIDE4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (14)

  • water
  • OCTYLDODECANOL
  • PRUNUS AMYGDALUS DULCIS OIL
  • GLYCERIN
  • POLYGLYCERYL-3 DICITRATE
  • CETYL ALCOHOL
  • BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
  • GLYCERYL STEARATE
  • COCO-CAPRYLATE
  • SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE
  • SODIUM STEAROYL GLUTAMATE
  • XANTHAN GUM
  • SODIUM BENZOATE
  • TOCOPHEROL

No data in our sources (9)

  • STEARATE
  • HELIANTHUS ÁNNUUS SEED OIL
  • du total est
  • Contrôlé par Bureau Veritas selon le référentiel Cosmos standard disponible sur Précautions d'emploi
  • avec les yeux
  • 94430 Chenne Service client
  • Quai Jules Guesde Sur-Seine
  • éviter le contact yeux
  • 12 M Distribution FRANPRIX 123

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.