
Cleaner pick · Safest produit de beaute we have rated
hair borist
conditionner hydro intensive color care+18 on ingredient safety
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.
All 1 cleaner option, safest first Never ordered by affiliate payout.
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
What we know about the packaging
Unidentified0 of 1 identified
Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
Data availability
Good18 of 27 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 18 of 27 listed ingredients; 9 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (14)
No data in our sources (9)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.