Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · California Proposition 65
US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 93% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 4 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+What we know about the packaging
Unidentified0 of 1 identified
Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
Data availability
Robust14 of 14 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 14 listed ingredients.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from cosmeticsdesign-asia.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.