Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Email Diamant/Blancheur Absolue Dentifrice
Email Diamant

Blancheur Absolue Dentifrice

ToothpasteGTIN 3331300040845
R

Cleaner pick · Safest toothpaste we have rated

RiseWell

Mineral Toothpaste Flavorless

+75 on ingredient safety

$12

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 666 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

25OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 0–90

25▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

42-point split

0

Scan

42

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

666 found

See better →

Flagged

8 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 90-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 666 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

90 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 67% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·21 of 21 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 21 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (8)

    • CI741608/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • Limonene7/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Aroma6/10undeclared fragrance blendflavouringraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Sodium Lauryl Sulfate4/10common irritantcleansing · denaturant · foamingraters disagree

      Transparency concern · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Sodium Fluoride4/10antiplaque · oral careraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Calcium Hydroxide4/10bufferingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Calcium Peroxide4/10oxidisingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (13)

    • Sodium Bicarbonate
    • PEG-8
    • Hydrated Silica
    • Glycerinhumectant
    • Calcium Sulfate
    • Dipotassium Phosphate
    • Sodium Saccharin
    • Sodium Carbonate
    • PEG/PPG-116/66 Copolymer
    • Silica
    • Sodium Silicate
    • Calcium Carbonate
    • Aqua
    What these ingredient tags mean (4)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantSodium Lauryl Sulfate

      • Sodium Lauryl Sulfate: A strong cleansing agent used as the reference irritant in skin-irritation testing. OECD Test Guideline 439 (in vitro skin irritation, reconstructed human epidermis), paragraph 24: "The suggested PC is 5% aqueous SDS", sodium dodecyl sulphate, the same substance as sodium lauryl sulfate, CAS 151-21-3.
    • fragrance materialLimonene

      • Limonene: A citrus-smelling fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related isomers. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 88: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (37): stock that does not comply, lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off, may still be made available until 31 July 2028. It is marked on the racemic dl-limonene/Dipentene line and the (S)-(l-limonene) line, but NOT the (R)-p-mentha-1,8-diene (d-limonene) line, CAS 5989-27-5, whose duty was already running as entry 88 before Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 and so needed no transition. All three isomers are declared under the single glossary name "Limonene", so that name on a label does not identify which of them is present.
    • undeclared fragrance blendAroma

      • Aroma: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
    • humectantGlycerin

      • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

    Where this came from

    Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against pasteurshaving.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.