Phytonorm
Shampoo-Shower Mint Freshness
shower gels1lGTIN 3455270841216
Cleaner pick · Safest wash & scrub we have rated
Africology Skincare & Spa
Bio Therapy Body Wash+30 on ingredient safety
250ml · 60 ZAR · 24 ZAR/100 ml
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 40-point gap between the two loudest voices.
60Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 1797 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
40 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
What we know about the packaging
Unidentified0 of 1 identified
Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.
- Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good12 of 17 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 12 of 17 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (7)
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Strong contact sensitizerflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (5)
No data in our sources (5)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.