Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 24-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Cleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Lowest 76 · highest 100 · gap 24
Also screened — no listing found
Coverage & match quality
5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
no black box
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
Raters split here, so this 83 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
Flagged 2 of 30 ingredients: 2 of concern.
Starts at 100; 25 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 24 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Good22 of 27 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 22 of 27 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| waterantiplaqueskin conditioningsolvent | antiplaqueskin conditioningsolvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| HELIANTHUS ANNUUS SEED OILfragranceemollientskin conditioning | fragranceemollientskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| OLUS OILemollient | emollient | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| vegetable oilhair conditioningskin conditioning | hair conditioningskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| GLYCERINperfuminghumectantdenaturant | perfuminghumectantdenaturant | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| C10-18 TRIGLYCERIDESemollientskin conditioningsolvent | emollientskin conditioningsolvent | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| CETYL ALCOHOLfragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | fragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| POLYGLYCERYL-6 DISTEARATEsurfactant - emulsifying | surfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| 1‚2-HEXANEDIOLskin conditioningsolvent | skin conditioningsolvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| CERA ALBAperfumingfilm formingemollient | perfumingfilm formingemollient | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| BEESWAXfragrancebindingemulsion stabilising | fragrancebindingemulsion stabilising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| CIRE D'ABEILLE | Not in our sources | No data | |
| HYDROXYETHYL ACRYLATE | Not in our sources | No data | |
| SODIUM ACRYLOYLDIMETHYL TAURATE COPOLYMER | Not in our sources | No data | |
| PARFUMperfumingfragrance | perfumingfragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| JOJOBA ESTERSemollientmoisturisingsoothing | emollientmoisturisingsoothing | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| CAPRYLYL GLYCOLemollientdeodoranthair conditioning | emollientdeodoranthair conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| SODIUM STEAROYL GLUTAMATEcleansinghair conditioningsurfactant - emulsifying | cleansinghair conditioningsurfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| POLYGLYCERYL-3 BEESWAXsurfactant - emulsifying | surfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| TOCOPHERYL ACETATEantioxidantskin conditioning | antioxidantskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| CITRIC ACIDfragrancechelatingbuffering | fragrancechelatingbuffering | Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| POLYSORBATE 60surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| SORBITAN ISOSTEARATEsurfactant - emulsifying | surfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| PERSEA GRATISSIMA fruit extractemollientmoisturisingsmoothing | emollientmoisturisingsmoothing | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| sunflower | Not in our sources | No data | |
| FRAGRANCE | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced | |
| avocado | Not in our sources | No data |
Where this came from
Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against redcare-pharmacie.fr ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.