Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Natessance/Kids Apple Body & Hair Shampoo
N
Natessance

Kids Apple Body & Hair Shampoo

Kids Shampoo500mlGTIN 3517360010145
Baby Bath & Shampoo, Lavender (2019 formulation)

Cleaner pick · Safest hair we have rated

Healing-Scents

Baby Bath & Shampoo, Lavender (2019 formulation)

+42 on ingredient safety

$12–30

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 72 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

58OUT OF 100Fair

Ingredient safety only

range 42–90

58▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

46-point split

53

Scan

42

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

72 found

See better →

Flagged

8 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 48-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 72 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

48 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 58% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·24 of 31 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 24 of 31 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (8)

    • Limonene7/10perfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Cocamidopropyl Betaine6/10antistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Parfum6/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Fragrance6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Lactic Acid4/10humectant · buffering · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • hydrolyzed wheat protein4/10antistatic · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice Powder4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Sodium Hydroxide4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (16)

    • water
    • Coco-Glucoside
    • Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate
    • Decyl Glucoside
    • Disodium Lauryl Sulfosuccinate
    • sodium chloride
    • Glycerin
    • Sodium Benzoate
    • Glyceryl Laurate
    • Dicaprylyl Ether
    • Lauryl Alcohol
    • Cocos Nucifera oil
    • Ascorbyl Palmitate
    • Tocopherol
    • coconut
    • Chlorophyllin-Copper Complex

    No data in our sources (7)

    • Pyrus Malus extract
    • C175810
    • Apple Fruit
    • from farming
    • Sans tensio-actifs sulfatés
    • Sulfated surfactants free
    • Sans

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against pharmaciepolygone.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.