Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Dermato Science/SensilianeSun Protective Milk 50+
SensilianeSun Protective Milk 50+
Dermato Science

SensilianeSun Protective Milk 50+

sunscreen200mlGTIN 3560070848898
Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

Cleaner pick · Safest sunscreen we have rated

Iunik Global

Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

+36 on ingredient safety

$24

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1246 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

55OUT OF 100Fair

range 46–73

64▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

90

Scan

100

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1246 found

See better →

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 55-point gap between the two loudest voices.

45ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1246 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

55 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·30 of 31 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 30 of 31 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (2)

    • TRIETHANOLAMINE8/10fragrance · buffering · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • ALCOHOL DENAT6/10fragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (28)

    • water
    • CAPRYLIC
    • CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
    • GLYCERIN
    • BUTYL METHOXYDIBENZOYLMETHANE
    • ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE
    • ETHYLHEXYL TRIAZONE
    • DICAPRYLYL CARBONATE
    • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
    • TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
    • BIS-ETHYLHEXYLOXYPHENOL METHOXYPHENYL TRIAZINE
    • PHENYLBENZIMIDAZOLE SULFONIC ACID
    • SQUALANE
    • C20-22 ALKYL PHOSPHATE
    • CETYL ALCOHOL
    • POLYPROPYLSILSESQUIOXANE
    • C20-22 ALCOHOLS
    • DIMETHICONE
    • BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
    • MACADAMIA_ TERNIFOLIA SEED OIL
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • AMMONIUM ACRYLOYLDIMETHYLTAURATE
    • XANTHAN GUM
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
    • LAMINARIA OCHROLEUCA EXTRACT
    • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
    • SODIUM GLUCONATE
    • TOCOPHEROL

    No data in our sources (1)

    • VP COPOLYMER

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.