Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 51-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Lowest 49 · highest 100 · gap 51
Also screened — no listing found
Also screened — no listing found
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
no black box
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
Raters split here, so this 63 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
Flagged 7 of 26 ingredients: 3 restricted, 1 of concern, 3 regulated allergens.
Starts at 100; 19 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 51 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust25 of 26 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 25 of 26 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| AQUAsolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| CETYL ALCOHOLfragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | fragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| DIPALMITOYLETHYL DIMONIUM CHLORIDEantistatichair conditioning | antistatichair conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| CETYL ESTERSemollientskin conditioning | emollientskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| PARAFFINUM LIQUIDUMemollientantistaticskin protecting | emollientantistaticskin protecting | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| SORBITAN CAPRYLATEsurfactant - emulsifying | surfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| METHOXY PEG/PPG-7/3 AMINOPROPYL DIMETHICONEhair conditioning | hair conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| PARFUMperfumingfragrance | perfumingfragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSEfilm formingbindingemulsion stabilising | film formingbindingemulsion stabilising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| PANTHENOLantistatichair conditioningskin conditioning | antistatichair conditioningskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| LAURYL ALCOHOLemollientemulsion stabilisingsurfactant - emulsifying | emollientemulsion stabilisingsurfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| GLYCERIN PROPANEDIOL | Not in our sources | No data | |
| BENZOIC ACIDpreservativefragranceph adjusters | preservativefragranceph adjusters | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| POLYSILICONE-15uv filteruv absorberlight stabilizer | uv filteruv absorberlight stabilizer | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED OILemollienthair conditioningskin conditioning | emollienthair conditioningskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| MYRISTYL ALCOHOLemollientemulsion stabilisingsurfactant - foam boosting | emollientemulsion stabilisingsurfactant - foam boosting | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| SODIUM HYDROXIDEbufferingdenaturant | bufferingdenaturant | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| CITRIC ACIDfragrancechelatingbuffering | fragrancechelatingbuffering | Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| PUNICA GRANATUM FRUIT EXTRACTskin conditioning | skin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| SODIUM BENZOATEpreservativefragranceanticorrosive | preservativefragranceanticorrosive | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| POTASSIUM SORBATEpreservativefragrance | preservativefragrance | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| BENZYL SALICYLATEuv absorberperfuming | uv absorberperfuming | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| HEXYL CINNAMALperfuming | perfuming | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| LINALOOLperfumingdeodorant | perfumingdeodorant | EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| CI 16255coloranthair dyeing | coloranthair dyeing | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| CI 20470colorant | colorant | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |