Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Carrefour/Depil Men Hair Removal Cream
Depil Men Hair Removal Cream
Carrefour

Depil Men Hair Removal Cream

Hair Removal Cream200mlGTIN 3560071196479
Cold Wax Hair Sensitive Skin Formula

Cleaner pick · Safest hair removal we have rated

Parissa

Cold Wax Hair Sensitive Skin Formula

+79 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 152 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

34OUT OF 100Horrible

range 31–44

21▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

27-point split

15

Scan

42

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

152 found

See better →

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 27-point gap between the two loudest voices.

15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 152 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

27 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·17 of 24 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 17 of 24 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • CI 741808/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • PARFUM6/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE4/10bufferingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (14)

    • AQUA
    • UREA
    • CETEARYL ALCOHOL
    • ISOPROPYL MYRISTATE
    • CETEARETH-20
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOL
    • PANAX GINSENG ROOT EXTRACT
    • SPIRULINA MAXIMA EXTRACT
    • LAMINARIA DIGITATA EXTRACT
    • ASCOPHYLLUM NODOSUM EXTRACT
    • ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS LEAF EXTRACT
    • GLYCERIN
    • CALCIUM GLUCONATE
    • SODIUM CHLORIDE

    No data in our sources (7)

    • POTASSIUM
    • HYDROXIDE
    • BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER LEAF EXTRACT
    • PORPHYRA UMBILICALIS
    • ANNUUS SEED OIL
    • COPOLYMER
    • BENZOATE

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against amazon.fr ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.