Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Marque Repère/Extra Soft Conditioner with Argan Oil and Camellia
MR
Marque Repère

Extra Soft Conditioner with Argan Oil and Camellia

apres shampoingGTIN 3564700743461

Your composite

39OUT OF 100Horrible

range 31–73

31▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

85-point split

15

Scan

100

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1 found

See better →

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 1 cleaner alternative

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 85 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    15
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    25

Lowest 15 · highest 100 · gap 85

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
  • California Proposition 65

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Greenlens Packaging ScanIndependentunverified match
      46

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan15 on 0–100→15
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen100 on 0–100→100
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen25 on 0–100→25
    Average of 15 · 100 · 25pillar31

    Raters split here, so this 31 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    15/100

    Flagged 3 of 16 ingredients: 1 prohibited, 2 restricted. Score capped: a prohibited (banned) substance is present.

    Penalties alone would give 25, but a prohibited substance is present, so the score is capped at 15 — a genuine hazard isn’t diluted away by a long ingredient list.

    • CETRIMONIUM CHLORIDE (1) / STRARTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE (1)EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • Disodium 3 -[(2,4-dimethyl-5-sulphonatophenyl)azo]-4-hydroxynaphthalene-1-sulphonate (Ponceaux SX; CI 14700) when used as a substance in hair dye productsEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex II (prohibited)−55
    • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10

    Starts at 100; 13 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 85 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Flagged ingredients

    • CETRIMONIUM CHLORIDE (1) / STRARTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE (1)3 positions →
    • Disodium 3 -[(2,4-dimethyl-5-sulphonatophenyl)azo]-4-hydroxynaphthalene-1-sulphonate (Ponceaux SX; CI 14700) when used as a substance in hair dye products3 positions →
    • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDE3 positions →

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·13 of 16 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 13 of 16 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    AQUA→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CETEARYL ALCOHOL→emollientemulsion stabilisingopacifyingemollientemulsion stabilisingopacifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    DIPALMITOYLETHYL HYDROXYETHYLMONIUM METHOSULFATE→antistaticdetanglinghair conditioningantistaticdetanglinghair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    GLYCERYL STEARATE PARFUM→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    CETRIMONIUM CHLORIDE→preservativeantimicrobialantistaticpreservativeantimicrobialantistatic4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    PEG-7 GLYCERYL COCOATE SODIUM BENZOATE→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    POLYSORBATE 20→surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    PANTHENOL→antistatichair conditioningskin conditioningantistatichair conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CITRIC ACID POTASSIUM SORBATE→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    GLYCERIN→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CI 15985→colorantcolorantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    PANTOLACTONE→humectantskin conditioninghumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    ARGANIA SPINOSA KERNEL OIL→emollientskin conditioningemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CAMELLIA JAPONICA FLOWER EXTRACT→emollientskin conditioningemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    CI 14700→colorantcolorant8/10EU-prohibited· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    SODIUM HYDROXIDE→bufferingdenaturantbufferingdenaturant4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced