Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Listerine/Cool Mint Zero Mouthwash
Cool Mint Zero Mouthwash
Listerine

Cool Mint Zero Mouthwash

Mouthwash500mlGTIN 3574660650044

Your composite

38OUT OF 100Horrible
—
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
46
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

    Also screened — no listing found

    • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
    • IARC Monographs
    • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
    • California Proposition 65

    Environmental

      Also screened — no listing found

      • EU Microplastics Restriction

      Labor

      • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
        30

      Packaging

      • Greenlens Packaging ScanIndependentunverified match
        46

      Coverage & match quality

      2 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

      • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
      • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

      no black box

      How this score is built

      We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

      1. 1

        Collect each rater's own score

        Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

      2. 2

        Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

        Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

      3. 3

        Average per axis, but keep the spread

        Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

      4. 4

        Your weights make the overall

        The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

      worked example · Labor

      • Cruelty-Free Certification30 on 0–100→30
      Single raterpillar30

      Weighted by what you care about

      Tune your weights

      composite recomputes live

      +
      Ingredient safetyno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Environmentalno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      1.0×
      1.0×
      0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

      Ingredients, decoded

      Data availability

      Limited·3 of 16 characterized

      Our sources have reference data on 3 of 16 listed ingredients; 13 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

      Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
      IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
      Acqua→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      glicole propolenico→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      sorbitolo→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      poloxamer 407→surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
      laurisolfato di sodio→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      eucaliptolo→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      acido benzoico→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      benzoato di sodio→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      salicilato di metile→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      timolo→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      saccarina sodica→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      fluoruro di sodio→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      mentolo→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      sucralosio→—Not in our sourcesNo data
      aroma→flavouringflavouringNo flags in our sourcesReferenced
      CI 42053→colorantcolorantNo flags in our sourcesReferenced

      Where this came from

      Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against melonistore.com ↗

      Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.