Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Weleda/Skin Food Body Milk
Skin Food Body Milk
Weleda

Skin Food Body Milk

Body Lotion200mlGTIN 3596200062117

Your composite

66OUT OF 100Fair

No safety data

—
Safety
—
Eco
85
Labor
46
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · IARC Monographs

    Environmental

      ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

      Labor

      • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Weleda as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

      Packaging

      • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 11, 2026. about this rater →

      Coverage & match quality

      2 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

      • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
      • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

      Weighted by what you care about

      Tune your weights

      composite recomputes live

      +
      Ingredient safetyno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Environmentalno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      1.0×
      1.0×
      0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

      What we know about the packaging

      Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

      Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

      • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

      This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

      How we know the packaging

      Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

      The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

      Ingredients, decoded

      Data availability

      Not enough to score·0 of 1 characterized

      Our sources have reference data on 0 of 1 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill. That is not enough of the label for a safety score to be honest, so we do not publish one.

      No data in our sources (1)

      • weleda

      Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

      Where this came from

      Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against frenchbeautyhub.com ↗

      Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.