Color Riche extraordinaire 204

lip cosmetics6mlGTIN 3600522459552

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

+85 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree

Find on Amazon See all 12930 cleaner options

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 64-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent

64IARC MonographsGovernment

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

All 12930 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

64 pts apart

A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65

Environmental

Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Labor

Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates L'Oréal as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Labor1.0×

Packaging1.0×

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good52 of 62 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 52 of 62 listed ingredients; 10 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (16)

MAY CONTAIN CI 77891raters disagree
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
TITANIUM DIOXIDEuv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
PARFUMundeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
FRAGRANCEundeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CI 45410colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
RED 28 LAKEcosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CI 15850colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
RED 7colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CI 45380colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
RED 22 LAKEcosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CI 19140colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
YELLOW 5 LAKEcosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CI 42090colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
BLUE 1 LAKEcosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
RED 7 LAKEcosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
RED 6cosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

No data in our sources (10)

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

undeclared fragrance blendPARFUM
- PARFUM: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.

L'Oréal

Color Riche extraordinaire 204

lip cosmetics6mlGTIN 3600522459552

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+85 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree

Find on Amazon See all 12930 cleaner options

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 64-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent

64IARC MonographsGovernment

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

All 12930 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

64 pts apart

A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65

Environmental

Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Labor

Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates L'Oréal as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Labor1.0×

Packaging1.0×

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good52 of 62 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 52 of 62 listed ingredients; 10 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (16)

MAY CONTAIN CI 77891raters disagree
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
TITANIUM DIOXIDEuv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
PARFUMundeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
FRAGRANCEundeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CI 45410colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
RED 28 LAKEcosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CI 15850colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
RED 7colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CI 45380colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
RED 22 LAKEcosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CI 19140colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
YELLOW 5 LAKEcosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CI 42090colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
BLUE 1 LAKEcosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
RED 7 LAKEcosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
RED 6cosmetic colorantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

No data in our sources (10)

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

undeclared fragrance blendPARFUM
- PARFUM: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.