Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/L'Oréal/Paris Lash Paradise Mascara Primer
Paris Lash Paradise Mascara Primer
L'Oréal

Paris Lash Paradise Mascara Primer

beautyGTIN 3600523503384
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+70 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 12450 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

35OUT OF 100Horrible

range 30–52

30▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

40-point split

15

Scan

55

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12450 found

See better →

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.

15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
80EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 12450 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

65 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 60% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates L'Oréal as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

    The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·32 of 39 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 32 of 39 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • styrene10/10solventraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • bht7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (29)

    • aqua
    • water
    • paraffin
    • potassium cetyl phosphate
    • copernicia cerifera cera
    • carnauba wax
    • ammonium methacrylate copolymer
    • cera alba
    • beeswax
    • synthetic beeswax
    • polybutene
    • cetyl alcohol
    • glyceryl dibehenate
    • hydroxyethylcellulose
    • acacia senegal gumfragrance material
    • tribehenin
    • caprylyl glycol
    • glyceryl behenate
    • sodium dehydroacetate
    • hydrogenated jojoba oil
    • hydrogenated palm oil
    • disodium edta
    • butylene glycol
    • sodium laureth sulfate
    • ricinus communis seed oil
    • castor seed oil
    • maltodextrin
    • potassium sorbate
    • centaurea cyanus flower extract

    No data in our sources (7)

    • ethylene
    • acrylic acid copolymer
    • acrylates
    • bis
    • diglyceryl polyacyladipate
    • steareth
    • code f i l

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.