L'Oréal Paris
Unbelieva'brow Micro Tatouage Ebony
BrowGTIN 3600523939206
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 33-point gap between the two loudest voices.
55Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
Split · 33 pts apart- 68
- 85
- 55
- 60
- 88
Lowest 55 · highest 88 · gap 33
Also screened — no listing found
- US NTP Report on Carcinogens
- IARC Monographs
- ECHA SVHC Candidate List
- EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
- California Proposition 65
Recognized on a safer-ingredients list
Environmental
Also screened — no listing found
Labor
- 30
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
no black box
How this score is built
no black box
How this score is built
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
- 1
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
- 2
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
- 3
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
- 4
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
- Greenlens Ingredient Scan68 on 0–10068
- Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–10085
- Greenlens Precautionary Screen55 on 0–10055
- ANSES Endocrine Disruptors60 on 0–10060
- Greenlens Tolerance Screen88 on 0–10088
Average of 68 · 85 · 55 · 60 · 88pillar63
Raters split here, so this 63 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Why the safety score
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
68/100
Flagged 4 of 15 ingredients: 2 restricted, 1 of concern.
- N,N-BIS(2-HYDROXYETHYL)- P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE SULFATEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
- AMMONIAEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
- BHT / BHACommon transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
Starts at 100; 12 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 33 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Flagged ingredients
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust15 of 15 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 15 listed ingredients.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| AQUA / WATER | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized | |
| ALCOHOL DENATfragranceantimicrobialantifoaming | fragranceantimicrobialantifoaming | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| STYRENE/ACRYLATES/AMMONIUM METHACRYLATE COPOLYMERfilm formingopacifying | film formingopacifying | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| BUTYLENE GLYCOLfragrancehumectantskin conditioning | fragrancehumectantskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| POLOXAMER 407surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| METHYLPROPANEDIOLsolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| SILICAabrasiveabsorbentanticaking | abrasiveabsorbentanticaking | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| COCO-GLUCOSIDEcleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansing | cleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansing | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| PHENOXYETHANOLpreservativeantimicrobial | preservativeantimicrobial | Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| POTASSIUM SORBATEpreservativefragrance | preservativefragrance | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| SODIUM LAURETH-12 SULFATEcleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansing | cleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansing | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| CITRIC ACIDfragrancechelatingbuffering | fragrancechelatingbuffering | Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| XANTHAN GUMbindingemulsion stabilisinggel forming | bindingemulsion stabilisinggel forming | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| AMMONIUM HYDROXIDEbufferingdenaturant | bufferingdenaturant | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| BHTfragranceantioxidant | fragranceantioxidant | Endocrine-active· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
Where this came from
Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against cfdirect.com.au ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.