Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 46-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Cleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Lowest 54 · highest 100 · gap 46
Also screened — no listing found
Also screened — no listing found
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
no black box
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
Raters split here, so this 66 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
Flagged 7 of 31 ingredients: 1 restricted, 2 of concern, 4 regulated allergens.
Starts at 100; 24 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 46 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Good23 of 31 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 23 of 31 listed ingredients; 8 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| AQUAsolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| WATERantiplaqueskin conditioningsolvent | antiplaqueskin conditioningsolvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| CETEARYL ALCOHOLemollientemulsion stabilisingopacifying | emollientemulsion stabilisingopacifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| BEHENTRIMONIUM CHLORIDEpreservativeantistatichair conditioning | preservativeantistatichair conditioning | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| PARFUMperfumingfragrance | perfumingfragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| FRAGRANCE | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced | |
| AMINOPROPYL TRIETHOXYSILANEsurfactant - cleansing | surfactant - cleansing | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| STARCH ACETATEemollienthair conditioningskin conditioning | emollienthair conditioningskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| NIACINAMIDEsmoothing | smoothing | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| LACTIC ACIDhumectantbufferingskin conditioning | humectantbufferingskin conditioning | Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM EXTRACTmoisturisingskin conditioning | moisturisingskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| SUGAR CANE EXTRACT | Not in our sources | No data | |
| HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSEfilm formingbindingemulsion stabilising | film formingbindingemulsion stabilising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| CHLORHEXIDINE DIGLUCONATEpreservativeantimicrobialoral care | preservativeantimicrobialoral care | Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| CAMELLIA SINENSIS LEAF EXTRACTuv absorberfragranceantimicrobial | uv absorberfragranceantimicrobial | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| BENZYL ALCOHOLpreservativeperfumingsolvent | preservativeperfumingsolvent | EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| LINALOOLperfumingdeodorant | perfumingdeodorant | EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| PUNICA GRANATUM EXTRACTfragranceastringenttonic | fragranceastringenttonic | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| ISOPROPYL ALCOHOLperfumingantifoamingsolvent | perfumingantifoamingsolvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| 2-OLEAMIDO-1‚3-OCTADECANEDIOLskin conditioning | skin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| PYRUS MALUS EXTRACT | Not in our sources | No data | |
| APPLE FRUIT EXTRACT | Not in our sources | No data | |
| PYRIDOXINE HCI | Not in our sources | No data | |
| CETYL ESTERSemollientskin conditioning | emollientskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| CITRIC ACIDfragrancechelatingbuffering | fragrancechelatingbuffering | Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| CITRUS MEDICA LIMONUM PEEL EXTRACT | Not in our sources | No data | |
| LEMON PEEL EXTRACT | Not in our sources | No data | |
| HEXYL CINNAMALperfuming | perfuming | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| AMYL CINNAMALperfuming | perfuming | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| FIL C163595 | Not in our sources | No data | |
| 2 | Not in our sources | No data |