Cleaner pick · Safest masks we have rated
bliss
Pro Microneedling Gel Mask+60 on ingredient safety
$40
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 72-point gap between the two loudest voices.
22Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 2385 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
72 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Garnier as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
How we know the packaging
Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.
A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good28 of 33 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 28 of 33 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (5)
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (23)
- water
- GLYCERIN
- butylene glycol
- ammonium polyacryloyldimethyl taurate
- caprylyl glycol
- cellulose acetate butyrate
- coceth 7
- cordyceps sinensis extract
- dipotassium glycyrrhizate
- ethylhexylglycerin
- maltodextrin
- panax ginseng root extract
- peg 40 hydrogenated castor oil
- polyphosphorylcholine glycol acrylate
- POLYVINYL ALCOHOL
- ppg 1 peg 9 lauryl glycol ether
- PROPYLENE GLYCOL
- royal jelly
- sodium chloride
- sodium hyaluronate
- sodium polyacrylate
- sodium polyacrylatestarch
- XANTHAN GUM
No data in our sources (5)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against meds.se ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.