Rimmel London
Blush Natural Color 120 Rose Pink
blush5gGTIN 3607342558250
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+79 on ingredient safety
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.
0ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 18462 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
85 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Rimmel London as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
10 ratings · 4 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
What we know about the packaging
Unidentified0 of 1 identified
Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.
- Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good21 of 29 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 21 of 29 listed ingredients; 8 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (9)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)flagged by 5 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (12)
No data in our sources (8)
- tridecyl trimelliate
- polyglyceryl-3
- diisostearate
- silica dimethyl silyate
- D&C red n°6 barium lake
- D&C red n°7 calcium lake
- D&C red n°30 aluminium lake
- CI 77360
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.