Why L'eau des aventuriers scores the way it does | Greenlens
Fragonard · L'eau des aventuriers
Why this score
Three independent Greenlens lenses read the same 15 ingredients and land 60 points apart. That gap is not an error. Each lens asks a different question, and this page shows every answer, ingredient by ingredient, blended into nothing.
How well-studied are these ingredients?
Data coverage · Robust
15/15
Our sources have reference data on all 15 listed ingredients. Our sources can only speak to ingredients they recognize — either flagged by an authority or known to be a common, well-characterized ingredient. An uncharacterized ingredient is a gap in our data, not a clean bill of health: a quiet safety scan over ingredients we can’t place is a weaker signal than one over ingredients we can.
Three lenses, one ingredient list
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
0Horrible
The regulatory baseline. Follows EU cosmetic law: prohibited and restricted ingredients cost points, and allergen labelling is capped so it cannot tank a score on its own.
Flagged 12 of 15 ingredients: 1 prohibited, 1 restricted, 2 of concern, 8 regulated allergens.
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
60Fair
The strict lens. Flags any ingredient with a listed hazard trait (SIN List, IARC, Prop 65), even when regulators still permit it.
Flagged 1 of 15 ingredients on hazard grounds: 1 strong sensitizer. Score capped: a strong sensitizer is present.
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
25Horrible
The lenient lens. Trusts dose and regulation: permitted ingredients kept within their legal caps are tolerated, and only genuinely prohibited substances take a big hit.
Flagged 2 of 15 ingredients: 1 prohibited, 1 restricted (within-limit). Score capped: a prohibited (banned) substance cannot be tolerated.
These lenses disagree. A split of 60 points crosses our disagreement threshold (20). We keep every verdict and never average them; the table below is where the split comes from.
Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
The overall ring on the product page is the weighted mean of the four pillars using your weights, computed fresh on every visit and never stored. How each lens's reference lists were built, penalty by penalty, is on the methodology page.
−N points subtracted by that lens, labelled with its concern · noted, 0 seen but tolerated under that philosophy · · not on that lens's reference lists. Open an ingredient for the full reasoning and every rater's position. 3 other ingredients matched no list at all.