Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Rimmel London/The Only 1 Lipstick 120
The Only 1 Lipstick 120
Rimmel London

The Only 1 Lipstick 120

lip cosmetics4gGTIN 3614222677789

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+84 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 12902 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

43OUT OF 100Poor

range 39–59

16▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
30
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

46-point split

0

Scan

0

Precautionary

46

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12902 found

See better →

Flagged

14 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 80-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
80ECHA SVHC Candidate ListGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 12902 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

80 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Rimmel London as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 4 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good·37 of 52 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 37 of 52 listed ingredients; 15 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (14)

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

  • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

  • PROPYLPARABEN7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

  • BHT7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • PARFUM6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • FRAGRANCE6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CYCLOPENTASILOXANE4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • POLYETHYLENE4/10film forming · abrasive · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • CI 158504/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CI 454104/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CI 172004/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CI 160354/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (23)

  • PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
  • POLYBUTENE
  • PHENYLISOPROPYL DIMETHICONE
  • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
  • EICOSENE COPOLYMER
  • TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
  • OZOKERITE
  • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
  • TRIHYDROXYSTEARIN
  • PPG-10
  • 1 DIMETHICONE
  • SILICA
  • TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
  • ALUMINA
  • ROSA CANINA FRUIT OIL
  • TRIMETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
  • TIN OXIDE
  • RICINUS COMMUNIS SEED OIL
  • IRON OXIDES
  • CASTOR
  • CI 77491
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77499

No data in our sources (15)

  • VP
  • CETYL PEG
  • MAY CONTAIN
  • D&C RED NO
  • 7 CALCIUM LAKE
  • 27 ALUMINUM LAKE
  • 6 BARIUM LAKE
  • 6 LAKE
  • FD&C YELLOW NO
  • 5 ALUMINUM LAKE
  • FD&C BLUE NO
  • 1 ALUMINUM LAKE
  • 33 ALUMINUM LAKE
  • FD&C RED NO
  • 40 ALUMINUM LAKE

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • undeclared fragrance blendPARFUM

    • PARFUM: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.