Uriage
Roseliane
crema40mlGTIN 3661434003394
Cleaner pick · Safest crema we have rated
La Roche-Posay
Lipikar Baume AP+M+23 on ingredient safety
200ml
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
All 2 cleaner options, safest first Never ordered by affiliate payout.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
raters agreeA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
4 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
What we know about the packaging
Unidentified0 of 1 identified
Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.
- Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Not enough to score18 of 47 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 18 of 47 listed ingredients; 29 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill. That is not enough of the label for a safety score to be honest, so we do not publish one.
Worth a look (2)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (16)
No data in our sources (29)
- CETEARYL ETHYLHEXA
- NOATE
- BUTY
- ROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
- DIGLY
- CERIN-BUTYLENE GLYCOL-GLYCERIN
- PO
- LYMETHYL METHACRYLATE-PROPYLHEPTYL CAPRYLATE
- PENTAERY-THRITYL DIS
- TEARATE-STEARETH-2
- BRASSICA CAMPESTRIS
- STEROLS
- GLY
- CERYL STEARATE PEG-100 STEARATE
- PALM OIL AMINOPRO
- PANEDIOL ESTERS
- MICA ACRYLATES
- C10-30 ALKYL CROSSPOLYMER-TOCOPHERYL o-CYMEN-5-OL
- PANAX GIN
- SENG ROOT EXTRACT
- BIOSACCHARIDE GUM-1-ASIATICOSIDE
- SORBITOL-MALTODEXTRIN
- POLYMETHYL
- SILSESQUIOXANE
- ASCOPHYLLUM NODO
- SUM EXTRACT
- ASPARA
- GOPSIS ARMATA EXTRACT
- ACRYLATE ACETATE
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.