Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Laboratoire giphar/INSTANT BEBE Oil-Lime Liniment
LG
Laboratoire giphar

INSTANT BEBE Oil-Lime Liniment

uncategorized500mlGTIN 3664696005021
BioCare Baby All Weather Cream

Cleaner pick · Safest skin we have rated

Estelle & Thild

BioCare Baby All Weather Cream

+13 on ingredient safety

75ml · 149 SEK · 198.67 SEK/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 282 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

67OUT OF 100Fair

range 63–73

87▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

lenses agree

100

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

282 found

See better →

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 20-point gap between the two loudest voices.

80ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 282 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

20 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 75% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·11 of 12 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 11 of 12 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (2)

    • ascorbic acid6/10fragrance · antioxidant · bufferingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • citric acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (9)

    • Olea europaea fruit oil
    • aqua
    • stearalkonium hectorite
    • caprylyl glycol
    • propylene carbonate
    • ethylhexyl glycerin
    • PEG-8
    • tocopherol
    • ascorbyl palmitate

    No data in our sources (1)

    • calcium hydroxyde

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.