Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/By Terry/Purple Line Designer Waterproof Eyeliner
Purple Line Designer Waterproof Eyeliner
By Terry

Purple Line Designer Waterproof Eyeliner

makeup1.7mlGTIN 3700076443998
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+78 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 12763 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

34OUT OF 100Horrible

range 28–50

22▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
49
Pkg

Why this score

44-point split

10

Scan

54

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12763 found

See better →

Flagged

6 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.

5ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
70EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 12763 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

65 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates By Terry as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·27 of 32 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 27 of 32 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (6)

    • Styrene10/10solventraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • Methylparaben7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Propylparaben7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

    • Benzyl Alcohol6/10fragrance materialpreservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Ammonium Hydroxide4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (21)

    • Aqua
    • Water
    • Ci 77499
    • Iron Oxides
    • Ammonium Methacrylate Copolymer
    • Butylene Glycol
    • Ppg-16
    • Sorbitol
    • Laureth-2 Benzoate
    • Sodium Laureth-12 Sulfate
    • Capric Glycerides
    • Sodium Methylparaben
    • Sodium Cocoyl Apple Amino Acids
    • Caprylic
    • Capric Triglyceride
    • Sodium Polyacrylate
    • Potassium Sorbate
    • Tetrasodium Edta
    • Coconut Acid
    • Hexylene Glycol
    • Sodium Chloride

    No data in our sources (5)

    • Acrylates
    • Bis-Peg
    • 16 Peg
    • 16 Dimethicone
    • Peg-6 Caprylic

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • fragrance materialBenzyl Alcohol

      • Benzyl Alcohol: Used both as a fragrance component and as a preservative; the EU names it either way. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 45: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (38), which is footnote (37) plus a condition: stock that does not comply may still be made available until 31 July 2028 only "provided that they comply with the restrictions applicable on 15 August 2023", and only if it was lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off. Entry 45 covers its non-preservative use; it is separately an allowed preservative at Annex V entry 34.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from ethicalelephant.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.