Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Biologique Recherche/Lait U Botanical Cleansing Milk
Lait U Botanical Cleansing Milk
Biologique Recherche

Lait U Botanical Cleansing Milk

CleanserGTIN 3700693200028
CLAY CLEANSER WITH LAVENDER Travel Size

Cleaner pick · Safest cleansers & exfoliants we have rated

Sodashi

CLAY CLEANSER WITH LAVENDER Travel Size

+18 on ingredient safety

16 AUD

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1675 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

48OUT OF 100Poor

range 46–54

82▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
32
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

90

Scan

100

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1675 found

See better →

Flagged

1 ingredient

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 25-point gap between the two loudest voices.

75California Safe Cosmetics ProgramGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1675 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

25 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked Jul 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · IARC Monographs

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Biologique Recherche as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Partly identified·1 of 2 identified

    1 of 2 packaging components is a named material; Plastic (unspecified) is recorded only in general terms, so that part of the score is a stand-in.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

    The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·26 of 32 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 26 of 32 listed ingredients; 6 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (1)

    • POLYACRYLAMIDE4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (25)

    • WATER
    • CAPRYLIC
    • CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
    • SQUALANE
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOL DICAPRYLATE
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOLcommon irritant
    • PENTYLENE GLYCOL
    • PRUNUS AMYGDALUS DULCIS OIL
    • CORYLUS AVELLANA SEED OIL
    • CETEARYL ISONONANOATE
    • GLYCERYL STEARATE
    • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
    • C13-14 ISOPARAFFIN
    • PEG-20 GLYCERYL STEARATE
    • CETEARYL ALCOHOL
    • CETEARETH-20
    • ETHYL OLEATEfragrance material
    • ETHYL LINOLEATEfragrance material
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • P-ANISIC ACID
    • CETYL PALMITATE
    • LAURETH 7
    • ETHYL LINOLENATE
    • AQUA
    • SWEET ALMOND

    No data in our sources (6)

    • DICAPRATE
    • TRITICUM VULGARE
    • GERM EXTRACT
    • TOCOPH
    • HAZEL
    • WHEAT

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantPROPYLENE GLYCOL

      • PROPYLENE GLYCOL: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).

    Where this came from

    Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against katrinatique.com ↗

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfreekitty.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.