A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Coverage & match quality
1 rating · 1 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Not enough to score6 of 19 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 6 of 19 listed ingredients; 13 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill. That is not enough of the label for a safety score to be honest, so we do not publish one.
Worth a look (1)
Prop 65-listedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (5)
No data in our sources (13)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against angelhaircare.nz ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.