Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.
A government authority. Low-confidence auto-match — it may describe a different size or variant. Checked Jul 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates NIVEA as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
11 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Good19 of 23 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 19 of 23 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (12)
Reproductive-toxicant concernflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (7)
No data in our sources (4)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
fragrance materialLinalool, Butylphenyl Methylpropional, Limonene, Citronellol, Geraniol, Coumarin, Eugenol, Hexyl Cinnamal
undeclared fragrance blendParfum
humectantPanthenol
soothingPanthenol
Where this came from
Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against makeupstore.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.