Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Unilever/Shock, Glacier Water & Extreme Mint
Shock, Glacier Water & Extreme Mint
Unilever

Shock, Glacier Water & Extreme Mint

shower gels250mlGTIN 42153061
Bio Therapy Body Wash

Cleaner pick · Safest body we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Body Wash

+80 on ingredient safety

250ml · 60 ZAR · 24 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 4866 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

46OUT OF 100Poor

range 41–61

20▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
30
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

25-point split

0

Scan

13

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

4866 found

See better →

Flagged

16 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 4866 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

82 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

10 ratings · 4 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·32 of 33 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 32 of 33 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (16)

  • Hydroxyisohexyl 3-Cyclohexene Carboxaldehyde10/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

  • DMDM Hydantoin8/10preservativeraters disagree

    Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

  • Limonene7/10perfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • Cocamidopropyl Betaine6/10antistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

    Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Parfum6/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Hexyl Cinnamal6/10perfumingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Linalool6/10perfuming · deodorantraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Acrylates Copolymer4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Menthol4/10fragrance · denaturant · refreshingraters disagree

    EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Lactic Acid4/10humectant · buffering · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Sodium Hydroxide4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CI 607304/10colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (16)

  • Aqua
  • Sodium Laureth Sulfate
  • Cocamide MEA
  • Mentha Aquatica Leaf Extract
  • Thermus Thermophillus Ferment
  • Glycerin
  • Propylene Glycol
  • Mica
  • Disodium EDTA
  • Sodium Chloride
  • PPG-12
  • Polysorbate 60
  • Sorbitan Stearate
  • Synthetic Wax
  • Sodium Benzoate
  • Potassium Sorbate

No data in our sources (1)

  • Butylphenyl Methylpropianol

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against beautyontrial.co.uk ↗

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.