Hipp
Milk Lotion Sensitiv
lotion50mlGTIN 42241331
Cleaner pick · Safest lotion we have rated
Frank LeBlond
Lotion Metisse+25 on ingredient safety
120ml
Ingredient safety1 rater
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 58-point gap between the two loudest voices.
42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 2 cleaner options, safest first Never ordered by affiliate payout.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
58 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
What we know about the packaging
Unidentified0 of 1 identified
Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.
- Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good16 of 20 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 16 of 20 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (1)
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (15)
No data in our sources (4)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.