Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Simply Care/Cotton buds
SC
Simply Care

Cotton buds

cotton budsGTIN 4823071651256

Your composite

78OUT OF 100Good
—
Safety
78
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flagged

1 ingredient

What's flagged →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

    Also screened — no listing found

    • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
    • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
    • IARC Monographs
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
    • California Proposition 65
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors

    Environmental

    • EU Microplastics RestrictionGovernmentunverified match
      78

    Coverage & match quality

    1 rating · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Environmental

    • EU Microplastics Restriction78 on 0–100→78
    Single raterpillar78

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    Ingredient safetyno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Flagged ingredients

    • polypropylene4 positions →

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Fair·1 of 2 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 1 of 2 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    polypropylene→viscosity controllingviscosity controlling4/10EU microplastics-restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    cotton→—Not in our sourcesNo data