Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 55-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Cleaner options
See 3 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Lowest 0 · highest 55 · gap 55
Also screened — no listing found
Also screened — no listing found
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
no black box
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
Raters split here, so this 9 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
Flagged 10 of 25 ingredients: 2 prohibited, 2 restricted, 1 of concern, 5 regulated allergens.
Starts at 100; 15 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 28 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust25 of 25 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 25 listed ingredients.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aquasolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Stearyl Alcoholfragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | fragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Cetyl Alcoholfragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | fragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Stearamidopropyl Dimethylamineantistatichair conditioningsurfactant - cleansing | antistatichair conditioningsurfactant - cleansing | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Dimethiconeemollientantifoamingskin conditioning | emollientantifoamingskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Glutamic Acidhumectantantistatichair conditioning | humectantantistatichair conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Zinc Pyrithionepreservativeanti-seborrheicanti-sebum | preservativeanti-seborrheicanti-sebum | EU harmonised CMR (cat. 1)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Parfumperfumingfragrance | perfumingfragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Benzyl Alcoholpreservativeperfumingsolvent | preservativeperfumingsolvent | EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Citric Acidfragrancechelatingbuffering | fragrancechelatingbuffering | Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Sodium Chloridefragranceoral carebulking | fragranceoral carebulking | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Linaloolperfumingdeodorant | perfumingdeodorant | EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Butylphenyl Methylpropionalperfumingfragrance | perfumingfragrance | Reproductive-toxicant concern· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Limoneneperfumingdeodorantsolvent | perfumingdeodorantsolvent | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Hydroxyisohexyl 3-Cyclohexene Carboxaldehydeperfumingfragrance | perfumingfragrance | EU-prohibited· flagged by 4 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Hexyl Cinnamalperfuming | perfuming | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Magnesium Nitratehair conditioning | hair conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Citronellolperfuming | perfuming | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Tocopheryl Acetateantioxidantskin conditioning | antioxidantskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Sodium Polynaphthalenesulfonateemulsion stabilisinggel formingsurfactant - cleansing | emulsion stabilisinggel formingsurfactant - cleansing | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| CI 19140coloranthair dyeing | coloranthair dyeing | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Methylchloroisothiazolinonepreservative | preservative | Strong contact sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Magnesium Chlorideviscosity controlling | viscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| CI 15510colorant | colorant | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Methylisothiazolinonepreservative | preservative | Strong contact sensitizer· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |