Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Soft and gentle/Dry Deodorant
Soft and gentle

Dry Deodorant

Deodorant150mlGTIN 5012008667203
Geranium Deodorant

Cleaner pick · Safest deodorant we have rated

Primally Pure

Geranium Deodorant

+35 on ingredient safety, gives up 11 on packaging

$16

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 639 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

61OUT OF 100Fair
65
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
57
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

639 found

See better →

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

All 639 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · IARC Monographs

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    2 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Not enough to score·6 of 20 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 6 of 20 listed ingredients; 14 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill. That is not enough of the label for a safety score to be honest, so we do not publish one.

    Worth a look (1)

    • isobutane8/10propellantraters disagree

      EU harmonised CMR (cat. 1) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (5)

    • methylal
    • propane
    • parfumundeclared fragrance blend
    • triethyl citrate
    • water

    No data in our sources (14)

    • 寶區 sa n de okel houdtemet lakien
    • eviter gn cas d iritation
    • cesser l utilisation
    • dng el
    • ne paspererotie yecart de la chaleur
    • des surfaces chaudes
    • des etincelles
    • des flammes nuesetate fumer a proximite
    • ne pas vaporiser u ur ama dinfammation
    • utiliser seulement selon les instructions recipient pressurise
    • peut dte i dnts butane
    • propylene gyal
    • equisetum anvense extract
    • sabvia officinalis oil solvent abuse can kill instantly phone

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • undeclared fragrance blendparfum

      • parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.