Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/The Body Shop/Almond Milk & Honey Soothing & Restoring Body Lotion
Almond Milk & Honey Soothing & Restoring Body Lotion
The Body Shop

Almond Milk & Honey Soothing & Restoring Body Lotion

Body Lotiontypically $12–30GTIN 5028197960209

Your composite

76OUT OF 100Good

No safety data

—
Safety
90
Eco
92
Labor
46
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flagged

1 ingredient

What's flagged →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

    Environmental

    • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates The Body Shop as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    3 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    Ingredient safetyno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Not enough to score·20 of 44 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 20 of 44 listed ingredients; 24 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill. That is not enough of the label for a safety score to be honest, so we do not publish one.

    Worth a look (1)

    • carbomer4/10emulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree

      EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (19)

    • water
    • Aqua
    • caprylic
    • capric triglyceride
    • elaeis guineensis oil
    • glycerinhumectant
    • butyrospermum parkii butter
    • glyceryl stearate
    • peg 100 stearate
    • phenoxyethanol
    • caprylyl glycol
    • parfumundeclared fragrance blend
    • fragranceundeclared fragrance blend
    • disodium edta
    • sodium hydroxide
    • prunus amygdalus dulcis seed extract
    • dehydroacetic acid
    • shea
    • sweet almond

    No data in our sources (24)

    • dimet learyl alcohol
    • utyros butter
    • c12 15 alky 1 elhoney
    • miel
    • prunus amydls cmprunus amygdalus dulcis oil
    • aluminun tdeny
    • succinate
    • prunus amyacae ed extract
    • xanthan gun nol
    • ciric acid
    • y free 021 ref 96020 other 12 m nuk for
    • fabrio rcado u
    • pour
    • littlehampton
    • bn17 6ls
    • uk
    • orest
    • nc 27587
    • usa
    • c.v
    • av
    • ejército nacional 579 40
    • ciudad de méxico
    • palm

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • undeclared fragrance blendparfum

      • parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
    • humectantglycerin

      • glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

    Where this came from

    Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against gomyz.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.