Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/goodmark/hip hair color
hip hair color
goodmark

hip hair color

paillettes cheveux125mlGTIN 5030834015456
NB

Cleaner pick · Safest color we have rated

Naturally Brite

Henna Hair Dye, Dark Brown

+82 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1812 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

53OUT OF 100Poor

range 47–76

18▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
—
Labor
64
Pkg

Why this score

25-point split

0

Scan

25

Precautionary

8

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1812 found

See better →

Flagged

15 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1812 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

85 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

12 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 2 identified

None of the 2 packaging components is identified beyond its broad material, so the packaging score is a stand-in — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good·25 of 32 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 25 of 32 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (14)

  • Formaldehyde10/10common irritantpreservative · antimicrobial · denaturantraters disagree

    Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 9 of 9 lists →

  • Isobutane8/10propellantraters disagree

    EU harmonised CMR (cat. 1) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • Butane8/10propellantraters disagree

    EU harmonised CMR (cat. 1) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • AlcoholDenat6/10fragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Melamine6/10raters disagree

    EU harmonised CMR (cat. 2) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Lauryl Pyrrolidone6/10cleansing · hair conditioning · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Parfum6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CI 158504/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CI 454104/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CI 772664/10colorantraters disagree

    IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Polyethylene Terephthalate4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • CI 160354/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (12)

  • Propane
  • Stearalkonium Hectorite
  • Propylene Glycolcommon irritant
  • Aqua
  • MICA
  • CI 15985
  • CI 47005
  • CI 77000
  • CI77007
  • Alcohol Denatcommonly drying
  • Polyurethane-11
  • CI 77510

No data in our sources (7)

  • HAIR COLOR
  • Tosylamide Copolymer
  • Vinyl Caprolactam
  • VP
  • Dimethylaminoethyl Methacrylate Copolymer
  • CI 77891 GLITTER
  • Vinyl Pyrrolidone

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (3)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • commonly dryingAlcohol Denat

    • Alcohol Denat: Denatured ethanol: a fast-evaporating solvent that thins a formula and leaves a dry finish. International Chemical Safety Card ICSC 0044, Ethanol (anhydrous), prepared by an international group of experts for the ILO and WHO: "The substance defats the skin, which may cause dryness or cracking." WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care (2009) records depletion of the skin lipid barrier by lipid-dissolving alcohols, and also that "the lipid-dissolving effect of alcohols is inversely related to their concentration". Both describe stronger exposures than a cosmetic formula.
  • common irritantFormaldehyde, Propylene Glycol

    • Formaldehyde: A preservative and a recognised contact allergen; the EU prohibits it in cosmetic products. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2015: Pontén A, Bruze M, "Formaldehyde", Dermatitis 2015;26(1):3-6, DOI 10.1097/DER.0000000000000075, PMID 25581665; prohibited in cosmetics by EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 Annex II entry 1577, inserted by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/831, which also deleted its Annex III and Annex V entries, so no nail-hardener use survives.
    • Propylene Glycol: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
  • undeclared fragrance blendParfum

    • Parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.