
Cleaner pick · Safest eye care we have rated
bliss
Peek Performance Overnight Repair Eye Cream+59 on ingredient safety
$26
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.
All 1106 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 56% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Charlotte tilbury as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
9 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust58 of 63 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 58 of 63 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (8)
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Prop 65-listedflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 1 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (50)
No data in our sources (5)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from wwd.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.