Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Schwarzkopf/Cotton Fresh Dry Shampoo
Cotton Fresh Dry Shampoo
Schwarzkopf · owned by Henkel

Cotton Fresh Dry Shampoo

Dry Shampoo150mlGTIN 5410091763732
Bio Therapy Shampoo

Cleaner pick · Safest cleansing we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Shampoo

+39 on ingredient safety, gives up 32 on packaging

250ml · 47.50 ZAR · 19 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1517 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

59OUT OF 100Fair

range 50–73

61▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
52▲▼ split
Labor
64
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1517 found

See better →

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Labor

A 44-point gap between the two loudest voices.

30Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofit
vs
74Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofit
050100

All 1517 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

25 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · IARC Monographs · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    44 pts apart
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Schwarzkopf as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 2 identified

    None of the 2 packaging components is identified beyond its broad material, so the packaging score is a stand-in — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

    The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Not enough to score·8 of 12 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 8 of 12 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill. That is not enough of the label for a safety score to be honest, so we do not publish one.

    Worth a look (3)

    • Butane8/10propellantraters disagree

      EU harmonised CMR (cat. 1) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Alcohol denat6/10commonly dryingfragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Linalool6/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (5)

    • Propane
    • Seed Oil Parfum
    • PEG-10 Olive Glycerides
    • Cotton
    • Fragrance Gestimonium Chloride Benzyl Salicylate

    No data in our sources (4)

    • Oryza Sativa pium Herbaceum
    • Hexyl Cinnand
    • et rtant
    • Geraniol Pheno Eau

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • commonly dryingAlcohol denat

      • Alcohol denat: Denatured ethanol: a fast-evaporating solvent that thins a formula and leaves a dry finish. International Chemical Safety Card ICSC 0044, Ethanol (anhydrous), prepared by an international group of experts for the ILO and WHO: "The substance defats the skin, which may cause dryness or cracking." WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care (2009) records depletion of the skin lipid barrier by lipid-dissolving alcohols, and also that "the lipid-dissolving effect of alcohols is inversely related to their concentration". Both describe stronger exposures than a cosmetic formula.
    • fragrance materialLinalool

      • Linalool: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.

    Where this came from

    Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against plein.be ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.