Urtekram
hand cream wild flowers
hand creams75mlGTIN 5701058006925
Cleaner pick · Safest hands & feet we have rated
Round Lab
Birch Moisturizing Hand Cream+41 on ingredient safety
$8.50
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 58-point gap between the two loudest voices.
42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 474 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
58 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
What we know about the packaging
Unidentified0 of 1 identified
Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.
- Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust23 of 26 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 23 of 26 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (3)
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (20)
- Aqua
- prunus amygdalus dulcis oil
- butyrospermum parkii butter
- polyglyceryl-3 dicitrate
- glycerin
- cetyl alcohol
- glyceryl stearate se
- zea mays starch
- glyceryl caprylate
- lysolecithin
- zinc ricinoleate
- cocos nucifera oil
- xanthan gum
- citrus aurantium dulcis peel oil
- sodium hyaluronate
- hexapeptide-11
- magnolia officinalis bark extract
- tocopherol
- betasitosterol
- squalene
No data in our sources (3)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.