Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Derma/Sun Lotion Kids, SPF50
Sun Lotion Kids, SPF50
Derma · owned by Unilever

Sun Lotion Kids, SPF50

sunscreen150mlGTIN 5709954039719
Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

Cleaner pick · Safest sunscreen we have rated

Iunik Global

Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

$24

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 288 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

69OUT OF 100Fair

range 61–76

96
Safety
84
Eco
52▲▼ split
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

2-point split

100

Scan

98

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

288 found

See better →

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Labor

A 44-point gap between the two loudest voices.

30Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofit
vs
74Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofit
050100

All 288 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · IARC Monographs · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Labor

44 pts apart
  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Derma as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 4 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·31 of 31 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 31 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (2)

  • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (29)

  • Aqua
  • Dibutyl Adipate
  • Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate
  • Ethylhexyl Triazone
  • Dicaprylyl Ether
  • Propylheptyl Caprylate
  • Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine
  • Oryza Sativa Bran Wax
  • Diethylhexyl Butamido Triazone
  • Hydrogenated Dimer Dilinoleyl/Dimethylcarbonate Copolymer
  • Hydrogenated Castor Oil
  • Microcrystalline Cellulose
  • Glyceryl Stearate
  • Acrylates/C12-22 Alkyl Methacrylate Copolymer
  • Glycerinhumectant
  • Disodium Cetearyl Sulfosuccinate
  • Undecane
  • Cellulose Gum
  • Tridecanefragrance material
  • Ethylhexylglycerin
  • Caprylyl Glycol
  • Arginine
  • Acacia Senegal Gumfragrance material
  • Tocopherol
  • Tocopheryl Acetate
  • Xanthan Gum
  • Coco-Glucoside
  • Sorbic Acid
  • Disodium Lauryl Sulfosuccinate
What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • humectantGlycerin

    • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".