Wet Wipes

moist wipesGTIN 6931149446654

Cleaner pick · Safest moist wipes we have rated

Style'White

+29 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree

Find on Amazon See all 6 cleaner options

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 45-point gap between the two loudest voices.

55Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment

100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

All 6 cleaner options, safest first Never ordered by affiliate payout.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

45 pts apart

A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65

Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 60% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Labor

Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Luxury as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Labor1.0×

Packaging1.0×

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “recyclable plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

Recorded only as “recyclable plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust9 of 10 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 9 of 10 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (4)

Benzalkonium chloridepreservative · antimicrobial · antistaticraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Benzethonium chloridepreservative · antimicrobial · deodorantraters disagree
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Citric acidfragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extracthumectant · emollient · oral careraters disagree
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

No flags in our sources (5)

No data in our sources (1)

Disodium edetate dihydrate

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

common irritantPropylene glycol
- Propylene glycol: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
humectantGlycerin
- Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

Luxury · owned by Henkel

Wet Wipes

moist wipesGTIN 6931149446654

Cleaner pick · Safest moist wipes we have rated

Style'White

Lingettes dentaires

+29 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree

Find on Amazon See all 6 cleaner options

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 45-point gap between the two loudest voices.

55Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment

100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

All 6 cleaner options, safest first Never ordered by affiliate payout.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

45 pts apart

A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65

Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 60% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Labor

Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Luxury as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Labor1.0×

Packaging1.0×

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “recyclable plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

Recorded only as “recyclable plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust9 of 10 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 9 of 10 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (4)

Benzalkonium chloridepreservative · antimicrobial · antistaticraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Benzethonium chloridepreservative · antimicrobial · deodorantraters disagree
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Citric acidfragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extracthumectant · emollient · oral careraters disagree
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

No flags in our sources (5)

No data in our sources (1)

Disodium edetate dihydrate

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

common irritantPropylene glycol
- Propylene glycol: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
humectantGlycerin
- Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".