
Cleaner pick · Safest moisturizers we have rated
Iunik Global
Beta Glucan Daily Moisture Cream+61 on ingredient safety
$17
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 68-point gap between the two loudest voices.
All 5311 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
What we know about the packaging
Partly identified1 of 2 identified
1 of 2 packaging components is a named material; Plastic (unspecified) is recorded only in general terms, so that part of the score is a stand-in.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
How we know the packaging
Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.
The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.
Data availability
Robust20 of 20 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 20 listed ingredients.
Worth a look (8)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Prop 65-listedflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (12)
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
common irritantIMIDAZOLIDINYL UREA
undeclared fragrance blendFRAGRANCE/PARFUM
retinoidRETINOL
rich occlusivePETROLATUM, DIMETHICONE
humectantGLYCERIN
Where this came from
Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against ebay.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.