Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Nuvel/Gel Limpiador Facial con Extracto de Toronja
Gel Limpiador Facial con Extracto de Toronja
Nuvel

Gel Limpiador Facial con Extracto de Toronja

CleanserGTIN 7501082790450
CLAY CLEANSER WITH LAVENDER Travel Size

Cleaner pick · Safest cleansers & exfoliants we have rated

Sodashi

CLAY CLEANSER WITH LAVENDER Travel Size

+63 on ingredient safety

16 AUD

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 3985 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

42OUT OF 100Poor

range 27–73

37▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

92-point split

62

Scan

8

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

3985 found

See better →

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 92-point gap between the two loudest voices.

8Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 3985 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

92 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·13 of 20 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 13 of 20 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (5)

    • dmdm hydantoin8/10preservativeraters disagree

      Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • methylisothiazolinone7/10preservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • cocamidopropyl betaine6/10antistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • fragrance6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • methylchloroisothiazolinone6/10preservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (8)

    • water
    • Glycerin
    • sodium chloride
    • peg 7 glyceryl cocoate
    • peg150 distearate
    • citrus grandis fruit extract
    • disodium edta
    • lactose

    No data in our sources (7)

    • sodium lauryl ether sulfate
    • capryloyl
    • caproyl methyl glucamide
    • lauroyl
    • myristoyl methyl glucamide
    • polyquatenium
    • fd

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against delsol.com.mx ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.