Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/O-Dolex/Deodorant Talc
Deodorant Talc
O-Dolex

Deodorant Talc

foot deodorants300gGTIN 7501361113000

Your composite

53OUT OF 100Poor

range 45–70

53▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 25-point gap between the two loudest voices.

45ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
70Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 25 pts apart
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate ListGovernmentunverified match
    65
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    65
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    70
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    45

Lowest 45 · highest 70 · gap 25

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • IARC Monographs
  • California Proposition 65

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • ECHA SVHC Candidate List65 on 0–100→65
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)65 on 0–100→65
    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist70 on 0–100→70
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors45 on 0–100→45
    Average of 65 · 65 · 70 · 45pillar53

    Raters split here, so this 53 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Flagged ingredients

    • boric acid6 positions →
    • camphor4 positions →

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Fair·3 of 5 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 3 of 5 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Talco sanitizado→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    zinc oxide→uv filteruv absorbercolorantuv filteruv absorbercolorantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    boric acid→antimicrobialbufferingdenaturantantimicrobialbufferingdenaturant9/10ANSES-prohibited in cosmetics· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    camphor→fragrancedenaturantplasticiserfragrancedenaturantplasticiser4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Cloruro de benzalconio→—Not in our sourcesNo data