Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Cariñositos/Baby Wet Wipes
C
Cariñositos

Baby Wet Wipes

baby wipesGTIN 7775022070234

Your composite

31OUT OF 100Horrible

Packaging only

—
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
31
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

    Environmental

      ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

      Packaging

      • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

      Coverage & match quality

      1 rating · 1 of 4 axes

      • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
      • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

      Weighted by what you care about

      Tune your weights

      composite recomputes live

      +
      Ingredient safetyno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Environmentalno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Laborno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      1.0×
      0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

      What we know about the packaging

      Partly identified·1 of 2 identified

      1 of 2 packaging components is a named material; Plastic (unspecified) is recorded only in general terms, so that part of the score is a stand-in.

      • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

      This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

      Ingredients, decoded

      Data availability

      Not enough to score·0 of 8 characterized

      Our sources have reference data on 0 of 8 listed ingredients; 8 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill. That is not enough of the label for a safety score to be honest, so we do not publish one.

      No data in our sources (8)

      • No tejido poliéster y viscosa
      • agua purificada
      • propilenglicol
      • cloruro de benzalconio
      • butilcarbamato de yodopropinilo
      • extracto de aloe vera
      • manzanilla
      • vitamina E

      Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.